Whether the 'evolving standards of decency' test should be applied to Sixth Amendment right to counsel protections and whether Florida's post-warrant litigation schedule violates due process rights

1. Whether the “evolving standards of decency” test , which ha s been recognized for Eighth Amendment protection s, should be used to analyze other constitutional protections where decency and public conscience would be implicated in this case, to the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. 2. Whether Petitioner’s due process rights recognized by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution are violated by Florida’s post-warrant litigation schedule by preventing Petitioner from being meaningfully heard and having an opportunity to fully investigate and present newly discovered evidence.