No. 25-5444
Steven Wilson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure dismissed-charges district-court judicial-review sentencing-colloquy third-circuit
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Third Circuit erred in determining that the sentencing colloquy of the district court did not unambiguously show the district court considered Mr. Wilson's dismissed state charges
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. WHETHER THE THIRD CIRCUIT ERRED IN DETERMINING THAT THE SENTENCING COLLOQUY OF THE DISTRICT COURT DID NOT UNAMBIGUOUSLY SHOW THE DISTRICT COURT CONSIDERED MR. WILSON’S DISMISSED STATE CHARGES?
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-09-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 22, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent