Whether the lower courts improperly applied federal law and misinterpreted constitutional and procedural rules in denying monetary relief

Petitioner Julia M. Robinson was unlawfully denied monitary relief in the amount Of $280,570,900.00. THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT CASE NO. 23-12488-HH AND THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA CASE NO. l:23-CV-00043-MHC and is now seeking review IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. The Petitioners Petition for Writ of Certiorari argues that both THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT CASE NO. 23-12488-HH AND THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA CASE NO.1:23-CV00043-MHC lower courts erred in its application of Federal Law, that both lower courts decisions conflicts with decisions by different Federal Circuit Courts, that the lower courts decisions are incorrect, and that The Petitioners Case presents an important question of Federal Law that requires review in THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Therefore, The Questions presented are: Why didn ’t The Northern District and The Appeals for The Eleventh Circuit court in Atlanta Georgia follow and properly apply The law, The Constitution, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and properly apply evidence turned into by The Plaintiff/Appellant to The case in both courts listed above?