Whether under Virginia Law, multiple procedural irregularities occurred in the Alexandria District Court and Federal Court proceedings that potentially violated due process and civil procedure rules

I: Whether under Virginia Law, when determining the majority of motions for this case, can unfair, unjust and biased decisions be made by denying and not enforcing federal and state statutes be made by the Alexandria District Court to only support the defendants in their case. So that the defendants can have a favorable outcome where decisions are applicable. Question II; Whether under Virginia Law, can the defendants counsel respond to my Interrogatories and Production of Documents with refusals and oppositions without following the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, so that at the time presented, I would not have any valid answers that would have been needed to present or research my case properly. Question III: Whether under Virginia Law, can the defendants counsel ignore the Federal Rides of Civil Procedure, verbally expressing that he would not comply and would not respond to my timely submitted Admission document, per federal law and state law. Question IV: Whether under Virginia Law, can evidence in legal proceedings that is determined relevant, such as phone records, text messages, pay stubs, federal tax forms, time stamps, and declarations be deemed non-material facts when presenting evidence to Alexandria Federal Court and counsel representing the defendants in this case. Question V: Whether under Virginia Law, can the defendants counter claim in this case be ignored throughout the entire judicial process without Notice and Opportunity to Be Heard in order to find favor in the defendants request to drop this case without just cause. Question VI: Whether under Virginia Law, can Alexandria Federal Court and the defendants counsel ignore my presentation of evidence to the Clerks office, without acknowledging its purpose, and send bits and pieces of it to the Richmond Appeal 4th Circuit Court in order to help the defendants win their case.