Whether a conflict exists between 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) and procedural jurisdictional standards for tolerable collateral jeopardy subject-matter jurisdiction

Wtetter 3 Con-Fl ict W* _a.ncl.. (n&.aza lez $. j-5$tak Court©/ Ccla awl. ke-re ipply £ sfak ^loceduM I W to cwnte 3A U^cedeat kittd § 22S3 (cXz) toloraUe cM>le je©p?oty Su^actmatter jcitisJicFi04 ?wlv€*4 tiey"f'issecL on said <^**1 £>a direct ipfedl as issue4kr«e (see■RTPcfcfol# A T ogtee cf 4Ff=(f2MW^ "DIRECT A??E»U ^2-Wfc^ker 3 Con£l:cf wl4h 1WmS i 2241(c)(3) pte-trltd ph/nary \urlscitcKonal] ^ug^^ jU't'cS</>'C ‘l'40Al I etyeef ©fl CoA's es/op/e/ vlzfr&vbs -&us Court ‘5 review “ a S-tehtCDurW I resort fniS^huU -tUeaAfeeecW ~ -d F^a?3 /lotiee appeJ-l <1S pent/ <nJ a.-^</ ^4e p^^se •/ki/' rict l*oe by 2Zt3,ZZij2. C5E6 AlT&l^ B Federal ©P&ER. gr^t^ Gotf) ’ ( SEE F A/crtCE of AP?Ert€, r^?3/