Whether the Eleventh Circuit and Northern District of Georgia courts improperly applied federal law and constitutional standards in denying monetary relief

Petitioner Julia M. Robinson was unlawfully denied monetary relief in the amount of $500,000,000.00. THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT CASE NO. 24-12513-AA AND THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA CASE NO. l::23-CV-05655 and is now seeking review IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. The Petitioner Petition for Writ of Certiorari argues that both THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT CASE NO. 24-12513-AA AND THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA CASE NO. l:23-CV-05655 lower courts erred in its application of Federal Law, that both lower courts decisions conflicts with decisions by different Federal Circuit Courts, that the lower courts decisions are incorrect, and that The Case presents an important question of Federal Law that requires review in THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. The both resides in The State of Georgia and she filed her appeal and served the through The U.S. Court Of Appeals in Atlanta Ga and THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES has jurisdiction over this case. Therefore, The Questions presented are: Why didn ’t The Northern District and The Appeals for The Eleventh Circuit court in Atlanta Georgia follow and properly apply The law, The Constitution, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and properly apply evidence turned into by The PlaintiffiAppellant to The PlaintiffTAppellant case in both courts listed above?