No. 25-5463

Trent Nelson v. URSA Major Corporation

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2025-08-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process-clause federal-court-procedure fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigation
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess FifthAmendment FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do Pro Se litigants have constitutional protections in federal court under the Due Process Clause?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Do a Pro Se litigant have constitutional provision in federal court? Violation of the 5th and 14th Amendments, "Due process clause". Ensures that the federal government does not deprive individuals of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. This means fair notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard. Violations occur if courts act arbitrarily or unfairly. Eminent domain clause: The government can't take property without providing just compensation. 2. Did the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals rely on the two audio tapes associated with the case, and the Docketing Statement? Along with the appellant brief and reply briefs to render the decision? Court error, the reason for accepting the appeal Wisconsin violated the due process clause. (Also, the court never rude on the discrimination and retaliation case, (error). "Medical Proof overlooked: see

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 24, 2025)
2025-02-04
Application (24A751) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until March 18, 2025.
2025-01-29
Application (24A751) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 18, 2025 to April 19, 2025, submitted to Justice Barrett.

Attorneys

Trent Nelson
Trent Nelson — Petitioner
Trent Nelson — Petitioner