Whether the Court should grant, vacate, and remand because the district court improperly considered retributive factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) when revoking or modifying a term of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)

1. Whether , in light of this Court's decision in Esteras v. United States , 145 S. Ct. 2031 (2025) and in order to maintain uniform application of this Court ’s precedent , the Court should grant, vacate, and remand, because the district court considered , contrary to Esteras, the retributive factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A)—such as promoting respect for the law —when revoking or modifying a term of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)? ii PARTIES Hombra Williams is the Petitioner; he was the Defendant -Appellant below before the 8th Circuit. The United States of America is the Respondent and was the Plaintiff -Appellee below.