No. 25-5473

Samreen Riaz v. Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2025-08-26
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law court-procedure due-process judicial-review legal-obstruction material-errors
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FirstAmendment FourthAmendment HealthPrivacy Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2026-02-20 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the judicial review of material errors can be obstructed

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

: obstructing judicial review of material errors?(Exhbhit A) Suggestive Answer: YES 2 Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons: Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons: Pursuant to Rules 8.208 and 8.488 of the California Rules of Court, the undersigned identifies the following interested entities or persons per rule 8.208.. APPEARANCE FOR Defendant and Respondent : The Dental Board Of OF Consumer Affairs/State OF California 2005 Evergreen street Suite 1550 Sacramento , California 95815. Department Of justice 1300 I street .Suite 125 Sacramento,CA 95815 Jamil Radwan Ghannam Vue@doj.ca.gov M-.Cantre,l » MD Abigail R Leaf Salinas Law Group 8405 N Fresno St., Ste. 150 Fresno CA 93720 aleaf@salinasiq.com APPEARANCE FOR Defendant and Respondent Severo PLC, 500 north central avenue Street , Glendale , ca 91203 mario@thebulldoq law (The Bulldog Law) McDonalds: 1401 E Noble Avenue,Visalia, California 93292 Me Donald's Corporate Off RLMK c onald's Management Office Phone: (559) 738-8588 Address: 7043 W Pershing Ct, Vi e ice 93291 (559) 627-2318 email address: City of Visalia: HERR PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP Attorneys at Law 100 Willow Plaza, Suite 300 3 Visalia, California 93291 Telephone: (559) 636-0200 ccurtiss@hpblaw.net Dated: By: Samreen Riaz 3 TABLE OF CONTENT COVER PAGE . 1 QUESTION PRESENTED . 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES . 3 TABLE OF CONTENT. . 4

Docket Entries

2026-01-14
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2025-12-16
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2025-11-10
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2025-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2025)

Attorneys

Samreen Riaz
Samreen Riaz — Petitioner
Samreen Riaz — Petitioner