The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.

Waiver of Starr, Warden of right to respond submitted.

Waiver of right of respondent Starr, Warden to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Mistelle J. Starr, Warden, et al. to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 26, 2025)