Did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals err by failing to address the misapplication of binding circuit precedents in Sean L. Hagins' Motion for compassionate release, particularly the relevance of United States v. Ward, 590 F. 3d 179 (3rd Cir. 2010), as it pertains to his sentence classification as lawful?

PRESENTED 1) Did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals err by failing to address the misapplication of binding circuit precedents in Sean L. Hagins* Motion for compassionate release, particularly the relevance of United States v. Ward, 590 F. 3d 179 (3rd Cir. 2010), as it pertains to his sentence classification as lawful? 2) Does the refusal to recognize the implecations of Ward constitute a manifest injustice, requiring classification on what constitutes "extraordinary and compelling" circumstances for compassionate release?