No. 25-5485
Taylor Dan Truex v. United States
Tags: constitutional-interpretation criminal-conviction firearm-prohibition historical-tradition second-amendment statutory-analysis
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2026-01-16
(distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does § 922(g)(1) violate the Second Amendment facially, and must courts examine historical traditions of disarmament when assessing its constitutionality?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
are: 1. Does § 922(g)(1) violate the Second Amendment facially? 2. To determine the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) as applied to a defendant , must courts examine whether there is a historical tradition permanently disarming a person with analogous convictions instead of relying on a historical tradition disarming someone serving a sentence ?
Docket Entries
2026-01-20
Petition DENIED.
2026-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
2026-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-11-07
Reply of Taylor Dan Truex submitted.
2025-11-07
Reply of petitioner Taylor Dan Truex filed.
2025-10-27
Memorandum for the United States in Opposition of United States submitted.
2025-10-27
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2025-09-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 27, 2025.
2025-09-18
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-09-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 26, 2025 to October 27, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-08-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 26, 2025)
Attorneys
Taylor Dan Truex
Kristin Michelle Kimmelman — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Kristin Michelle Kimmelman — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent