No. 25-549

Russian Federation v. Hulley Enterprises Ltd., et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2025-11-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: arbitration-agreement court-procedure foreign-state-immunity international-law jurisdiction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

"A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction" of a United States court where "the action is brought ... to confirm an award made pursuant to ... an agreement to arbitrate," and such agreement was "made by the foreign state with or for the benefit of a private party to submit to arbitration all or any differences which have arisen or which may arise between the parties with respect to a defined legal relationship." 28 U.S.C. §1605(a)(6).

The question presented is:

Whether §1605(a)(6) allows a United States court to exercise jurisdiction without first determining whether the foreign-state defendant agreed to arbitrate "differences ... between" itself and the plaintiff.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 28 U.S.C. §1605(a)(6) allows a United States court to exercise jurisdiction without first determining whether the foreign-state defendant agreed to arbitrate differences between itself and the plaintiff

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2026-01-05
Letter of December 31, 2025 from counsel for petitioner received. (Distributed)
2025-12-31
Letter of Russian Federation submitted.
2025-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-23
Motion to Consolidate of Russian Federation submitted.
2025-12-19
Reply of Russian Federation submitted.
2025-12-19
Reply of petitioner Russian Federation filed. (Distributed)
2025-12-05
Brief of Hulley Enterprises Ltd., et al. in opposition submitted.
2025-12-05
Brief of respondents Hulley Enterprises Ltd., et al. in opposition filed.
2025-11-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 5, 2025)

Attorneys

Hulley Enterprises Ltd., et al.
Steven Moffat ShepardSusman Godfrey L.L.P., Respondent
Russian Federation
David Peter RiesenbergPinna Goldberg U.S. PLLC, Petitioner