Whether the District Court abused its discretion by imposing an unconstitutionally vague and overbroad 'loitering' supervised release condition and placing the petitioner on lifetime supervision without sufficient justification

I. Did the District Court Abuse Its Discretion by Imposing an Unconstitutionally Vague and Overbroad “Loitering” Supervised Release Condition? II. Did the District Court Abuse Its Discretion by Placing Kessler on Lifetime Supervision Without Giving Sufficient Reasons? i TOPICAL INDEX Page QUESTIONS PRESENTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i OPINION BELOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 JURISDICTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS INVOLVED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 CUSTODY STATUS OF PETITIONER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2