No. 25-5517
Joshua Rodriguez v. United States
Tags: appellate-review evidence-rule hearsay-exception judicial-interpretation present-sense-impression reliability-standard
Latest Conference:
2025-10-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Have the federal appellate courts departed too far from the purpose and intent of the present-sense impression exception to the hearsay rule, such that the rule no longer provides a meaningful bulwark against the admission of unreliable evidence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Have the federal appellate courts departed too far from the purpose and intent of the pres ent-sense impression exception to the hearsay rule, such that the rule no longer provides a meaningful bulwark against the admission of unreliable evidence?
Docket Entries
2025-10-14
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-09-23
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 2, 2025)
Attorneys
Joshua Rodriguez
Jamesa J. Drake — Drake Law LLC, Petitioner
Jamesa J. Drake — Drake Law LLC, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent