Whether Maryland state courts' failure to recognize mental disabilities violates due process when enforcing a marital settlement agreement

1Whether a Maryland state courts' failure to recognize and accommodate a documented mental disability who is suffering from: ADementia and Alzheimer's disease. BMemory Impairment. CMajor depressive disorder. DLearning Difficulty. EMild Cognitive impairment. FSevere Depression and Social Anxiety. When enforcing a marital settlement agreement violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth (5th) V & Fourteenth (14th) XIV Amendments Rights, particularly when the petitioner lacked the mental capacity to understand or consent to the agreement's terms and conditions? 2Whether a Maryland courts' enforcement of a marital settlement agreement against a party with clinically diagnosed Dementia, Alzheimer ’s, And other documented mental disabilities, without providing adequate procedural safeguards, violates fundamental constitutional principles of fairness and due process Clause of U.S. Const. Fourteenth (14th) Amendment XIV? 3Whether a Maryland state courts' failure to provide reasonable accommodations for a mentally disabled litigant in family court proceedings constitutes discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth XIV Amendment and the Americans with Disabilities Act? 4Whether there is a compelling public interest in The Supreme Court review when state courts systematically fail to protect vulnerable parties with Mental disabilities in marital settlement agreements, raising significant constitutional concerns that affect similarly situated individuals nationwide? 5The Supreme Court has discretionary jurisdiction over state courts' decisions Under 28 U.S.C. § 1257(a). The Supreme Court of The USA should grant certiorari when The Petition attempts to frame the case as raising important federal questions about constitutional Protections for mentally disabled individuals.