Whether the United States and States are acting outside their statutory authority regarding the constitutional right to travel and the conversion of travel rights into driving privileges

PERTAINING TO LOWER FEDERAL COURT, APPEALS COURTS CRITICAL ERRORS IN REFUSAL TO ADDRESS CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS AND LAW PRINCIPLES PERTAINING TO PETITIONERS RIGHT TO TRAVEL FREELY (1) . How is it possible, according to constitutionally protected rights, the United States, and States are not acting outside their statutory authority regarding the right to travel? Memorandum of law at # Exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4 at Numbers 46 through 59 (2) . How is it possible, according to constitutionally protected rights, the United States, and States are not forcing, under Color of Law, Sovereign people to register their automobiles through the DMV departments when their own rules and regulations prescribe it a voluntary program? See Memorandum of Law at # Exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4 at Numbers 17 through 59 (3) . How is it possible, according to constitutionally protected rights, United States and States through the Departments of DMV can convert a right to travel into a privilege to drive? See Memorandum of Law at # Exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4 at Numbers 46 through 59 (4) . How is it possible, according to the Constitution and laws, that the Judge's UNREPORTED OPINIONS Case No. 1:2-cv00736 -KCD and U. S. Appeals Court For the Federal Circuit Case# 2420-2140 did not make Critical Errors that resulted in many violations? (5) . How is it possible that an Unreported Opinion supersedes constitutional law? See Memorandum of Law at # Exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4 at Numbers 16 through 45 (6) . How is it possible, according to constitutional law, that an opinion can have any basis according to law without any findings of facts and conclusions of law? See Memorandum of Law at # Exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4 at Numbers 16 through 45 (7) . How is it possible, according to constitutional law, that the judges' orders by both Courts rejecting the filing of a collateral attack did not act under Color of Law resulting in violation of due process of law? See Exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4 at Numbers 16 through 45