No. 25-5537

Benito M. Valdez v. United States

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2025-09-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights courtroom-access judicial-discretion public-trial sixth-amendment trial-procedure
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the Sixth Amendment right to a 'public trial' violated when a trial court conducts an entire trial phase at the bench with a white-noise machine to prevent audience members from hearing the proceedings, without making specific findings on the need for privacy?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Is the Sixth Amendment right to a “public trial” violated where the trial court—for the stated purpose of keeping th e proceedings private rather than public, but without making any case-specific findings on an overriding need for privacy—conducts an entire phase of the trial at the judge’s bench while using a white-noise machine to prevent anyone in the audience from hearing the trial? ii STATEMENT OF

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-15
Reply of Benito M. Valdez submitted.
2025-12-15
Reply of petitioner Benito M. Valdez filed. (Distributed)
2025-12-03
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-12-03
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-10-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 3, 2025.
2025-10-20
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-10-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 3, 2025 to December 3, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-09-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 3, 2025.
2025-09-19
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-09-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 3, 2025 to November 3, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2025)
2025-06-24
Application (24A1272) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 29, 2025.
2025-06-17
Application (24A1272) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 30, 2025 to August 29, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Benito M. Valdez
Jaclyn S. FrankfurtPublic Defender Service for DC, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent