Whether the Government's reliance solely on cooperator testimony without physical or forensic evidence was sufficient to convict Mr. Contreras-Avalos on Counts 1 and 8

1. Where the Government did not introduce any physical or forensic against Mr. Contreras-Avalos, and the only evidence introduced was cooperator testimony, was the evidence sufficient to convict Mr. Contreras-Avalos on Counts 1 and 8? i RULE 14.1(b) STATEMENT There are no parties in addition to those listed in the caption. ii