No. 25-5545
Miguel Angel Homedes v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review closing-argument due-process evidentiary-rules prosecutorial-misconduct trial-procedure
Latest Conference:
2025-10-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether improper prosecutorial statements in closing argument are sufficiently flagrant to warrant reversal, where they inserted facts not directly in evidence regarding a core aspect of the defense case?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether improper prosecutorial statemen ts in closing argument are sufficiently flagrant to warrant revers al, where they inserted facts not directly in evidence regarding a core aspect of the defense case?
Docket Entries
2025-10-14
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-09-23
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-06-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 6, 2025)
Attorneys
Miguel Homedes
Noah Robert Friend — Noah R. Friend Law Firm, Petitioner
Noah Robert Friend — Noah R. Friend Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent