No. 25-5550
Jermaine Nelson v. United States
Relisted (4)IFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge due-process felony-disarmament firearm-possession second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2026-01-16
(distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional on its face or as applied to Petitioner because, consistent with the Second Amendment, the federal government may not permanently disarm citizens with only remote-in-time, nonviolent prior felony convictions
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1 ) is unconstitutional on its face or as applied to Petitioner because, consistent wi th the Second Amen dment, the federal government may not permanently disarm citizens with only remote-in-time, nonviolent prior fe lony convictions.
Docket Entries
2026-01-20
Petition DENIED.
2026-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
2026-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-11-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-11-04
Memorandum for the United States in Opposition of United States submitted.
2025-11-04
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2025-09-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 5, 2025.
2025-09-29
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-09-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 6, 2025 to November 5, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-09-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 6, 2025)
Attorneys
Jermaine Nelson
Sarah Jane Baumgartel — Federal Defenders of New York, Inc., Petitioner
Sarah Jane Baumgartel — Federal Defenders of New York, Inc., Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent