Did the United States Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota abuse and usurp his authority and jurisdiction when he denied Petitioner's Motion to Disqualify Judge Kimberly J. Mueller due to conflict of interest?

L Did the united states fnagistrate ju^e dennis M. Cota abuse and usurp his authority and. jurisdiction wen he denied Petitioner' Motion to Disqualify Jigde Kilted J. Mjell.ec", due to conflict of tocest ly Jxferent in Favor of Petitioner and against the Ihited States District Court of California, Kiterly J. teller, in Case No 1:22-07-02-41, ? 2. Did The dated States Court District Magistrate Jlr ’ge Demis M Cota, usurp his authority and jurisdiction vtea he denied Petitioner ’ motion for aitiy of toe te^xxrients Default filed on 12/27/2D23, for the Attoroy General's failure to timely answer lone order to show cause, tost was due on 1/02/2024, by a qualified response due to fatal jurisdictiaial -defect ty JUDl-fl'lIS in Case Kb(s) 23<T7-O5133: 25-07-01407: 3:14-MS-80."01-RS, and lack of standing, as there could he I'D Ugituiate valid jdgnent of the trial court in case noRP2H674, to vhich an appeal nay be taken due to fatal jurisdictia'al defect nro existant Plaintiff by judgnant ? 3. Did the WDC Magistrate Judge Danis M. Cota, not aid ari abet the continued false iiprisonnent ty toe Betitia-fir ty failing to issue a writ of habeas corpus to dischaed»the Petitioner from invalid and Cteonstit -utioial deprivation of liberty ly calulated design w complete utepation of and in ixeach of Cbnstitutional teth of Office, and treason upon one of toe people of poserity ? 4., Did The tbited States District Court Judge Kiterly J. Mueller not usurp her authority arrl jurisdiction and breach her Qxistitutional oath of Office ty failing to honor toe noticed uotion for dLsquelificatkxj, and feilure of recusal -was an i.ntcntioral act of treason upon her post to purposely inflict injury, irrq^rable naan,continued false irprlsroTent ly a sitting judge in aid and abet of petitioner ’ false iiprisantent by calculate! design, kwbqgly , and intmtionaly cassirg toe Petitioner an totentiwal tort, i 5. Did The Udited States District Jrge Kiterly J. teller ’> not conspire with the Attorney General, Mary A, Dabiza, to enter an invalid notion in ’Astention, kncwiig there was no valid judgnent of conrictto fran ’fehich a valid appeal nay be taken, making ary alleged state proceeding rioot asA MfflER OF LAW, making all orders entered. by the Judge Kkrterly J. Mueller, krowiqgly, wilfully and intelligently entering orders ' in complete disregard, for authority, jurisdiction and the rule of law, knowingly ? 6. Did The United States District Judge Kiterly J. Moeller rot enter arorder of dismissal without prejudice in cmtravention of toe Stendirg judgement as identified above., as a knowing, intenticml act of bias ’" and abuse of authority and. jurisdiction, to aici and abet the continued, false inprismnant of the Itetitiaoec ? 7. Did The United States Court of Appeals For Ihe ttoth Circuit error in its denial of the petition_for writ ot mandate, after petitioner provided clear and undisputable right by Judgrrots to an extraordirory ratey of mandate to correct a plain miscarriage of justice, continued, false inprisonnent, and acts ty the USDC, done in tad faith and with unclean hands in ccnplete ditenor, and in ccntravention of the starring authority ty expressed juteent in favor of the Petitioner as evidenced ty toe Jodgrents lodged in the offical record ?