No. 25-5577
Brandon Grunwaldt v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-statute federal-criminal-law minor-protection statutory-interpretation video-evidence
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment HabeasCorpus Patent EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
FirstAmendment HabeasCorpus Patent EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-10-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a video of a minor in a bathroom engaged in ordinary grooming activities depict 'the lascivious exhibition of the anus, genitals, or pubic area' of the minor?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Does a video of a minor in a bathroom engaged in ordinary grooming activities depict “the lascivious exhibition of the anus, genitals, or pubic area” of the minor? 1 RELATED CASES United States v. Grunwaldt, No. 3:21-cr-182, U. S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. Judgment entered March 31, 2023. United States v. Grunwaldt,, No. 23-4257, U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Judgment entered June 6, 2025. i
Docket Entries
2025-10-20
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.
2025-09-24
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 8, 2025)
Attorneys
Brandon Grunwaldt
David Quentin Burgess — Law Office of David Q. Burgess, Petitioner
David Quentin Burgess — Law Office of David Q. Burgess, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent