No. 25-5590
Jorge Enrique Barragan-Gutierrez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bruen-decision constitutional-rights criminal-law retroactivity second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment HabeasCorpus
SecondAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-10-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court's Bruen decision creates a retroactively applicable Second Amendment right and whether 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i) violates the Second Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1) Whether this Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen , 597 U.S. 1 (2022) , recognized a new right that is retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. 2) Whether 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i) , as applied to Mr. Barragan, violates the Second Amendment .
Docket Entries
2025-10-20
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.
2025-09-25
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2025)
2025-08-07
Application (25A153) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until September 2, 2025.
2025-08-04
Application (25A153) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 10, 2025 to October 9, 2025, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Jorge Enrique Barragan-Gutierrez
Adam Neil Mueller — Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C., Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent