No. 25-5592

Brijesh Goel v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2025-09-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights direct-appeal knowing-voluntary on-the-record right-to-counsel waiver
Latest Conference: 2025-10-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court of Appeals violated the Petitioner's constitutional right to counsel on direct appeal by failing to make an on-the-record finding that the Petitioner had made a knowing, voluntary, intelligent, and unequivocal waiver of the right to counsel on direct appeal?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Whether the Court of Appeals below violated the Petitioner's constitutional right to counsel on direct appeal by failing to make an on-the-record finding that the Petitioner had made a knowing, voluntary, intelligent, and unequivocal waiver of the right to counsel on direct appeal? -1

Docket Entries

2025-10-20
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.
2025-09-25
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2025)

Attorneys

Brijesh Goel
Brijesh Goel — Petitioner
Brijesh Goel — Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent