No. 25-5594

In Re Brian D. Dubuc

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-09-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: due-process equal-protection non-discretionary-mandate reservation-lands treaty-rights tribal-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a non-discretionary state supreme court mandate can be refused execution by a state trial court or restricted to tribal or US District Court jurisdiction when no plaintiff documentation triggers removal time

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1) Weather the Non Discretionary mandate of the state supreme court Can be refused execution by the state trial court or restrict removal to tribal or US District Court where “”No Paper “ Is Received from Plaintiff that Triggers removal time to prevent tribal and US court jurisdiction. 2) Whether in reservation lands lost in Allotment period recovered by lawful title by a registered member is preempted and trusted by law from State Action under treaty (Aug. 6, 1846. 9 Stat., 871. Ratified Aug. 8. 1846. Proclaimed Aug. 17, 1846).federal statue (S. Doc. No. 33, 55th Cong., 3rd Sess. (1898)) 25 C.F.R. 151.2(d), 25 CFR § 151.11(a)(2)(b). 3) Whether Registered members of Cherokee Nation in Indian Territory were Deprived of lands, business, rights , and equity's without due process, equal protection, by Impartial courts of Oklahoma and the United states secured under the Treaties 1833-1846 Oklahoma Constitution Article 1 § 3 US Const Art. I, § 8, Art. VI, cl. 2 , Contrary to Haines VS Kerner 404 US 519 520 (1972)

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-07-16
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2025)

Attorneys

Dubuc, In Re Brian D.
Brian D. Dubuc — Petitioner
Brian D. Dubuc — Petitioner