No. 25-5602

Christopher Guy Jasso v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2025-09-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: None
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2025-12-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Does the State of California’s refusal to fund its own habeas corpus system deny petitioner’s right to due process of law in that it not only blocked post appeal judgment issues but denied petition er his procedural due process right to review in federal courts? 2. In a state capital appellate case where shocking ly deficient performance is manifest in the appellate record and acknowledged by the reviewing court, was petitioner denied due process and the right to counsel because the reviewing court declined to decide the issue on direct appeal and required petitioner to pursue functionally unavailable state habeas corpus remedies which in turn deprived him of his right to federal review? PARTIES AND

Docket Entries

2025-12-15
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-11-20
Reply of petitioner Christopher Guy Jasso filed. (Distributed)
2025-11-07
Brief of State of California in opposition submitted.
2025-11-07
Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.
2025-09-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 10, 2025. See Rule 30.1.
2025-09-23
Motion of State of California for an extension of time submitted.
2025-09-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 10, 2025 to November 9, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2025)

Attorneys

Christopher Jasso
Glen Niemy — Petitioner
State of California
Holly D. WilkensState of California,Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Paige Boulton HazardCalifornia Office of the Attorney General, Respondent