No. 25-5608
Tags: collateral-review government-misconduct guilty-plea ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment structural-error
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2026-02-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a defendant collaterally attack his guilty plea via 28 U.S.C. § 2255 as unconstitutional based on surreptitious pre-plea government misconduct without establishing ineffective assistance of defense counsel? Does a Sixth Amendment attorney-client confidentiality violation that occurs during sentencing proceedings qualify as structural error?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. Can a defendant collaterally attack his guilty plea via 28 U.S.C. § 2255 as unconstitutional based on surreptitious pre-plea government misconduct without establishing ineffective assistance of defense counsel? II. Does a Sixth Amendment attorney-client confidentiality violation that occurs during sentencing proceedings qualify as structural error? i
Docket Entries
2026-01-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-27
Reply of Gary Jordan submitted.
2026-01-27
Reply of petitioner Gary Jordan filed. (Distributed)
2026-01-09
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-11-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 9, 2026.
2025-11-24
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-11-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2025 to January 9, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-11-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 10, 2025.
2025-11-04
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-11-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 10, 2025 to December 10, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-10-10
Response Requested. (Due November 10, 2025)
2025-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.
2025-09-25
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 14, 2025)
Attorneys
Gary Jordan
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent