No. 25-5619
Michael Garrick Denson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure dangerous-weapon evidence-sufficiency jury-verdict sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference:
2025-10-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the jury verdicts and whether the court erred in applying a two-level sentencing enhancement for possession of a dangerous weapon
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
þ. Whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the jury verdicts. ÿ. Whether the court erred in applying a two-level sentencing enhancement for possession of a dangerous weapon. Ā. Whether Defendant’s sentence was substantively unreasonable.
Docket Entries
2025-10-20
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.
2025-09-25
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 14, 2025)
Attorneys
Michael Denson
David Edmund Mullin — MULLIN & LAVERTY, LC, Petitioner
David Edmund Mullin — Mullin & Laverty, LC, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent