No. 25-563
Logan A. McLeod v. United States
Response RequestedResponse Waived
Tags: court-of-appeals-armed-forces factual-sufficiency military-justice national-defense-authorization-act statutory-interpretation uniform-code-military-justice
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-12-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has statutory authority to hold that a conviction is factually insufficient under 10 U.S.C. § 867(c)(1)(C).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has statutory authority to hold that a conviction is factually insufficient under 10 U.S.C. § 867(c)(1)(C)
Docket Entries
2026-02-06
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2026-01-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 6, 2026.
2025-12-31
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-12-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 7, 2026 to February 6, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-12-08
Response Requested. (Due January 7, 2026)
2025-11-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-11-18
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-11-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 10, 2025)
2025-09-02
Application (25A247) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 8, 2025.
2025-08-27
Application (25A247) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 9, 2025 to November 8, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Logan McLeod
Megan Renee Crouch — U.S. Air Force, Appellate Defense Division, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent