No. 25-5637
Jeffrey Michel v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bruen-test constitutional-challenge felony-disarmament firearm-possession second-amendment self-defense
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-11-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) permanently prohibiting individuals with felony convictions from possessing firearms is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment after Bruen and Rahimi
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Pursuant to the Second Amendment analysis dictated by New York State Rifle | & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), and clarified by United States v. | Rahimi, 144 S.Ct. 1889 (U.S. June 21, 2024), is 18 U.S.C. §922(g)), which | permanently prohibits individuals with felony convictions from possessing firearms | for legitimate self-defense, therefore unconstitutional, both facially and as applied to | Mr. Michel? , | |
Docket Entries
2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-01
Attorneys
Jeffrey Michel
Reginald Anthony Moss Jr. — The Tony Moss Firm, L.L.C., Petitioner
Reginald Anthony Moss Jr. — The Tony Moss Firm, L.L.C., Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent