No. 25-5637

Jeffrey Michel v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2025-09-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bruen-test constitutional-challenge felony-disarmament firearm-possession second-amendment self-defense
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) permanently prohibiting individuals with felony convictions from possessing firearms is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment after Bruen and Rahimi

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Pursuant to the Second Amendment analysis dictated by New York State Rifle | & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), and clarified by United States v. | Rahimi, 144 S.Ct. 1889 (U.S. June 21, 2024), is 18 U.S.C. §922(g)), which | permanently prohibits individuals with felony convictions from possessing firearms | for legitimate self-defense, therefore unconstitutional, both facially and as applied to | Mr. Michel? , | |

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 16, 2025)

Attorneys

Jeffrey Michel
Reginald Anthony Moss Jr.The Tony Moss Firm, L.L.C., Petitioner
Reginald Anthony Moss Jr.The Tony Moss Firm, L.L.C., Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent