No. 25-565
Yogesh K. Pancholi v. United States
Tags: bad-faith compulsory-process criminal-procedure discovery-violation sixth-amendment witness-preclusion
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Takings CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
AdministrativeLaw Takings CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-12-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Constitution permits a trial court to impose witness preclusion as a sanction for a discovery violation in a criminal case, absent a finding that the defense acted in bad faith.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Constitution permits a trial court to impose witness preclusion as a sanction for a discovery violation in a criminal case, absent a finding that the defense acted in bad faith
Docket Entries
2025-12-15
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-05
Amicus brief of Due Process Institute submitted.
2025-12-05
Brief amicus curiae of Due Process Institute filed. (Distributed)
2025-11-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-11-19
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-11-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-11-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 12, 2025)
Attorneys
Due Process Institute
Richard W. Mark — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Amicus
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Yogesh K. Pancholi
Jo-Ann Tamila Sagar — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner