Whether U.S. courts systematically violate due process and judicial conduct through administrative law and summary judgment procedures in pro se litigation

Q(x) 1. Shall U.S. Courts at all levels persist in extreme bias against pro se or any litigant, contrary to Judicial Code of Conduct and Loper Bright, especially in use of Administrative Law to nullify federal law for Summary Judgment, by dismissing a case when defense fails to Appear? This unjust procedure is systemic throughout the Ninth Circuit Court System, suggesting collusion in obstruction of justice. 2. Shall a judge who dismisses a case when defense fails to Appear be guilty of Misprision of Felony, having reviewed the felonies admitted by abandonment of the defense, then does nothing to adjudicate them, thus denying due process of law in defiance of Loper Bright? 3. Shall a ruling of “frivolous ” be rendered only after a thorough investigation of case facts and law, rather than subjective Judicial Discretion under Administrative Law? f 4 4. Shall judges in the Ninth Circuit persist in violation of Loper Bright, thus denying citizens 14th Amendment equal protection under the law, compared to citizens in other jurisdictions such as the Tenth Circuit, which complies with Loper Bright, per their home page? 5. Shall judicial immunity be reserved exclusively for Courts convened under Article III of the U.S. Constitution and denied to illegal Administrative Law courts convened in defiance of Loper Bright and Article III of the U.S. Constitution? a. Shall any Judge or Justice have absolute judicial immunity for violation of federal laws or the U.S. Constitution, thus denying citizen rights to due process of law? 6. Shall any court under cover of judicial immunity, dismiss a case of ADA violation as “frivolous ” without thorough investigation -potentially pending by ADA investigative Authority -thus denying due process and equal protection of law to our most vulnerable citizens? 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 387. Shall any Court illegally dismiss a Complaint as frivolous by Abuse of Process when Defendants are in default but the judge fails to enforce the 21-day FRCP rule? This unjust abuse of judicial discretion is systemic throughout the Ninth Circuit Court System. 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38