No. 25-5678
Thomas Jarrell Shoffner v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (6)IFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge criminal-law district-court-procedure firearms-regulation motion-to-dismiss statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2026-01-16
(distributed 6 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court Erred in Denying Appellant's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment on the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (1)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. Whether the District Court Erred in Denying Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss the Indictment on the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (1).
Docket Entries
2026-01-20
Petition DENIED.
2026-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
2026-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
2025-10-16
Rescheduled.
2025-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 20, 2025)
Attorneys
Thomas Shoffner
Seth Allen Neyhart — Law Office of Seth A. Neyhart, Petitioner
Seth Allen Neyhart — Law Office of Seth A. Neyhart, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent