No. 25-5699

In Re Mark Woods

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-law federal-appeals habeas-corpus jurisdictional-challenge statutory-interpretation suspension-clause
Key Terms:
ERISA HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2025-10-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the District Court and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals violate the suspension clause of the United States Constitution when precluding petitioner from pursuing claims under 28 U.S.C. section 2241?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Did the District Court and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals violate the suspension clause of the United States Constitution Art.I, section 9,cl.2 when it precluded petitioner from pursuing his claimsi directly under 28 U.S.C. section 2241? 2. Did the Supreme Court of the United States overturn its own precedent in Griggs v Provident Consumer Discount Co,459 US 56 (1988); where it held that "the filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional in that it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divest the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal?" i

Docket Entries

2025-10-14
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-06-13
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Mark Woods
Mark Woods — Petitioner
Mark Woods — Petitioner