No. 25-5700

Patricia Ann Jackson v. John Xiao-Jian Qian, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2025-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: affidavit default-judgment judicial-error liberal-construction pro-se truth-in-commerce
Latest Conference: 2025-11-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is truth expressed in the form of an affidavit? Is an unrebutted Affidavit fact? Is truth sovereign in commerce? Are pro se filings to be liberally construed? Did each court fail to validly and properly liberally construe each filing by pro se parties in this matter?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Petitioner, by and through its Duly Authorized Representative, was involved in a very serious car accident in 1998. As a result, Petitioner sustained multiple very serious injuries including but limited to several broken bones and other hard and soft tissue damage. Petitioner, successfully rehabilitated and after many years sought pain management care from Respondent by and/or through its’ Co-Defendant. After several years of treatment, Respondent suddenly, and unlawfully, stopped treating Petitioner, without replacement care. Petitioner sought care from other qualified professionals whom informed her that they could not provide similar nor the same level of pain management care due to the information recei ved in her “chart(s) ”/report(s) from Respondent. Petitioner immediately disputed the information contained in the chart(s)/report(s). Respondent made several allegations as to the source of the information, none of which were found to be credible, rendering the reports libelous. Respondent has not revised or otherwise removed the libelous reports resulting in the Action filed against them. Respondent, after making an appearance in the matter by way of their retained counsel, as admitted in their own Affidavits, willfully neglected the Action for over two (2) years resulting in an Entry of Default against them. Respondent immediately incompetently moved to have the Entry of Default set aside. Petitioner, by way of unrebutted affidavits), competently neutralized Respondents ’ Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default, however, the Judicial Officer literally litigated Respondents ’ motions from the bench, failed to liberally construe Petitioners Pro Se papers, among many other prejudicial judicial errors. Petitioner appealed according arriving at a Certiorari Writ as the only available remedy giving rise to the following question: Is truth expressed in the form of an affidavit? Is an unrebutted Affidavit fact? Is truth sovereign in commerce? Are pro se filings to be liberally construed? Did each court fail to validly and properly liberally construe each filing by pro se parties in this matter? Did Judicial Officer Judy Bae litigate Respondents “Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default ” from the Bench? Did Judicial Officer Judy Bae invalidly and improperly liberally construe Attorney filings? Is each reviewing judicial officer involved in dishonor or moral turpitude conduct? Page 2 of 11

Docket Entries

2025-11-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
2025-10-21
Brief of John Xiao-Jian Qian, et al. in opposition submitted.
2025-03-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 22, 2025)

Attorneys

John Xiao-Jian Qian, et al.
David Patrick BurkeNeil Dymott Hudson, APLC, Respondent
David Patrick BurkeNeil Dymott Hudson, APLC, Respondent
Patricia Ann Jackson
Patricia Ann Jackson — Petitioner
Patricia Ann Jackson — Petitioner