No. 25-5720
Gregory Bartunek v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process judicial-fact-finding jury-trial sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-11-14
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the rights of due process and to a jury trial are violated when courts impose sentences that, but for a judge-found fact, would be higher than they would otherwise impose
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether the rights of due process and to a jury trial are violated when courts impose sentences that, but for a judgefound fact, including, but not limited to, , or acquitted conduct, would be higher then they would otherwise impose . i
Docket Entries
2025-11-17
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/14/2025.
2025-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent