No. 25-5725

In Re David C. White

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-09-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law affirmative-action agenda-21 due-process educational-priority judicial-immunity
Key Terms:
DueProcess Copyright
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether United States citizens shall be given priority over foreign students for participation in doctoral programs of public educational institutions

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Q.(x) 1. Shall United States Citizens be given priority over foreign students for participation in doctoral programs of American institutions of public education? 2. Shall judicial immunity be reserved exclusively for Courts convened under Article III of the U.S. Constitution and denied to illegal Administrative Law courts convened in defiance of Loper Bright? 3. Shall any Court illegally dismiss a Complaint as frivolous under local Administrative Law, when Defendants are in default by the 21-day FRCP 12 rule, thus denying due process of law by leaving alleged crimes untried and un-adjudicated This process is in fact conspiracy for Obstruction of Justice. 4. Shall the United States be affected by another wrong United Nations false agenda of Agenda 21? 5. Shall any judge who dismisses a case when Defense fails to Appear be guilty of Misprision of Felony, having reviewed the felonies admitted by abandonment of the Defense, and then doing nothing to adjudicate them, in defiance of Loper Bright? 6. Shall the curriculum of public education institutions in the United States be forced to comply with Agenda 21, also referred to as “sustainable development, ” which like all UN missions agenda-driven mandates is about control of individual freedoms and population growth? 7. Shall a judge who dismisses a case when defense fails to Appear be guilty of Misprision of Felony, having reviewed the felonies admitted by abandonment of the defense, and then doing nothing to adjudicate them, in defiance of Loper Bright? 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 368. Shall any College deny entry to a doctoral program because of illegal Affirmative Action or DEI, even having made a public confession of making that the primary criterion for elimination, the Harvard case not withstanding? 9. Shall any state college teach a course promoted as an Environmental science with a wrong book? 10. Shall any Judge or Justice have Judicial Immunity from crimes committed in Court? The usual authority cited -Article III, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution -makes no mention of “Judicial Immunity. ” 11. Shall any state education institution teach a course of study promoted as one subject from textbooks or material on a completely different subject. This happened when the Environmental Science Program at Oregon State was taught from a textbook which is, in fact, a plagiarized Chemical Engineering book rebranded by cover as an Environmental Science textbook in violation of copyright, thereby diverting attention away from critical discussion of the climate change agenda? 12. Shall any Circuit Court violate its protocol for selecting a unique panel of judges for each case tried, when a litigant has simultaneously presented two or more unique cases for review? 13. Shall any Circuit Court refer a PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DISPOSITIVE ORDER to the same panel of judges whose extreme bias in dismissing that very case is being challenged by a pro se or any litigant? 14. Shall “good behavior ” in Article III, Section 1 be defined in part by compliance with Federal Rules, Federal Laws and the U.S. Constitution itself? 15. Shall judges in the Ninth Circuit persist in violation of Loper Bright, thus denying citizens 14th Amendment equal protection under 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38the law, compared to citizens in other jurisdictions such as the Tenth Circuit, which complies with Loper Bright, per their home page? 16. Shall Any Judge deny case discovery? 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-11-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-11-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
2025-09-12
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 24, 2025)

Attorneys

David White
David C. White — Petitioner
David C. White — Petitioner