Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 415 overrides Rule 403's requirement to balance probative value against prejudicial effect, whether Rule 413(d) allows admission of temporally remote propensity evidence for non-criminal prior acts, and whether Rule 404(b)(2) permits admission of prior bad acts evidence without establishing a non-propensity purpose

I. Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 415 overrides Rule 403’s requirement to balance the probative value of temporally remote propensity evidence against its prejudicial effect before such evidence can be admitted? II. Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 413(d) authorizes the admission of temporally remote propensity evidence that the defendant committed the “crime” of “sexual assault” when the alleged prior act did not constitute a crime or a sexual assault? III. Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)(2) permits the admission of “ modus operandi ” or “corroboration” evidence of prior “bad acts” without establishing a non-propensity purpose of the evidence, such as identity, absence of mistake, or another enumerated exception in Rule 404(b)(2)?