Takings DueProcess Immigration Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the Federal Circuit and lower courts systematically violated constitutional due process and judicial integrity through coordinated judicial misconduct and obstruction of justice across multiple federal dockets
1. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, led by Chief Judge Kimberly A. Moore, violate its mandatory duty under FRAP 27 and the United States Constitution by refusing for over 135+ days to adjudicate Petitioner ’s May 6, 2025, Combined Motion to Recall Mandate, Strike, and Vacate All Court Orders, thereby obstructing justice and perpetuating hate crimes under color of law, as evidenced by Moore ’s conceded “Fucking Muslim ” insult and coordination with fired DO J attorneys to evade service in Supreme Court Case 23-5543? 2Did Judge David A. Tapp of the United States Court of Federal Claims commit fraud, obstruction of justice, and hate crimes under color of law by issuing a retaliatory Anti-Filing Injunction on August 21, 2025 (ECF 34, Case No. 1:24-cv-00242-DAT), despite his status as a named defendant in a sealed Bivens action tampering with dockets, coordinating with Chief Judge Gee in C.D. Cal. Case No. on July 31, 2025, to deny on same day two Motions to Reopen under Rule 60(b) for Fraud on Courts, and ignoring irrefutable evidence of intellectual property takings? 3. Does the systemic judicial coup across 22 federal dockets since 2018, including government concessions via waivers in Supreme Court Cases 19-7708,216181, 22-5670, and 23-5543, demand unified mandamus relief to vacate all tainted orders, disqualify biased judges, and refer wrongdoers for impeachment and prosecution under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 371, 2382, and 1001, to restore judicial integrity as mandated by the American People ’s November 5, 2024, vote for law and order? 4. Should this Court, as guardian of the Constitution (Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137(1803)), declare all prior orders void ab initio to halt the erosion of public trust (Pew Research 2024: 75% distrust) and prevent further waste of taxpayer funds (S5.6M+ per U.S. ex rel. Adams, 813 F.3d 1259), ensuring no corrupt judicial officer undermines the Republic ’s rule of law?