Whether Florida has violated the Supremacy Clause by constructing a postconviction litigation system that provides no avenue for asserting retroactively applicable federal constitutional rules and whether the Florida Supreme Court has consistently failed to consider mitigating evidence in capital sentencing

1. Has Florida violated the Supremacy Clause by constructing a system of postconviction litigation that provides no avenue for the assertion of retroactively applicable rules of federal constitutional law . 2. Has the Florida Supreme Court repeatedly f ailed to t ake into account the diverse f railities of human kind in capital sentencing by consistently denigrating the f orce of proffered mitigating evidence.