1) Should Writ's D.S. Supreme Court grant Writ of Habeas Corpus petition, where the U.S Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's claim of this Courts "RETROACTIVE" case of Gossip V. Oklahoma, 195 S. 64, 612-22) L.Ed. 2d 90C2o2sY /* Napue violation? the prosecution's failed to correct false Testimony? and had a constitutional obligation to correct false testimony under Napue V. Tllini os 360 U.S. 26t793i Z~, Ed 2d 12/7, 79 S.Ct II73CI9S71

Also in accordance with the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act 7' as codified at *28 U.S.C. §22 tHCb), C2^ CAi fl Or

2) Should this U.S Supreme Court grant Writ of Habeas Corpus petition, where the US. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's claim of this court's controlling ruling case in McQuiggi a V. Perki n$, 5T69 U.S. 3 83, 1 33 S Ct, \92H ISSL. Ed, 2d 1019/2013 U5. LEXIS 4068^81 US. L.V/.H327, 82 IU-.R. F^d.^d FU.t.Weekly Fed. S213, M e re

Actual innocence *miscarria ^£ of iyosTict held fo be CSchulp') gateway through cuhuh sW prisoner petitioning for federal habeas corpus relief might pass.

These are conflicts c^ith this Courts rulings, and p€fifioner 's □-$ Const, Amend, 5^ NhK rights are

Whether the U.S. Supreme Court should grant a writ of habeas corpus where the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's claims of constitutional violations and actual innocence