No. 25-5757
Kristopher Jacob Freda v. Oregon
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-violations cruel-and-unusual-punishment eighth-amendment first-amendment fourteenth-amendment writ-of-mandamus
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment DueProcess FourthAmendment Punishment Securities
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment DueProcess FourthAmendment Punishment Securities
Latest Conference:
2025-11-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Will SCOTUS order a writ of mandamus to stop the State of Oregon from punishing Freda with cruel and unusual punishment and stop the Constitutional violations of the 1st, 8th, and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Will SCOTUS order a writ of mandamus to stop the State of Oregon from punishing Freda with cruel and unusual punishment and stop the Constitutional violations of the 1st, 8th, and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution?
Docket Entries
2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-07
Waiver of Oregon of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-07
Waiver of right of respondent Oregon to respond filed.
2025-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 29, 2025)
Attorneys
Oregon
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent