Securities
Whether a state can constitutionally prosecute multiple crimes from a single criminal episode after initial sentencing and release from custody
No question identified. : QUESTIOMS, presented 10 <xk£> »sa'i^ ^©<Sbf\ 1V713-■ "T' For c. <IV>A u«k of COhW ForAbfX-^yw^. torrXVuWcX ? av-F? ^Sr>H'b<x\ oroseoAtaxFoc jgkf coos VAiA^A? 3, Tt a StoW Vx&s AV& taxoiAec^e. 4V<A: /bonspUuo Cri’we Wox gc^mAteo <K*dt\Q ore criniNx\ e^kobfe.^uY AV^SWco dAcoses 4*6 Voc co u For sca^ 2r: SUCCT^v^ 4^ *Wr cones -exfVfce W cc^pMe^ TV\e \ f\\An u\ cci^ seft-Wice c<\^ Ake o^rsoq co^'dec) Kos. be&A rc\ease.<2> V <c>aa cxasW^ , (xc-d prs&ecuMot'-^ 4-bXf 4\, person U UDOMiu/'e. <pf 4\a£> exv§Vj\oc cX LoarrcvfAFor 4WSr Ovrres^ becvMes 4ve sV^Vs, u^r 4u*a »MP^Ek\4XA<AV Akeq k » JX 1. . . Ax oA ‘4A »>«!/A_».* . . .— dA . ^t^-. 7 Ak v g 5Do eXe^o.f rto.sv^xn&g/sn.o^n kZv4 *■ '^cL k 4s' *''aa'4 +te ' scvias . e>vver&2» -n>c due. purpcf-ss <sr q6ws>W ^e£>pc^q 9 C Do -be Cc>(\Y;V\O^ oF CChVk^H^ UnS \Hd\aV\OfcS. eV PeWfe^cc suwv of vu c^g. reVem^ w oasV^ a\\ OA Ol^ /» Xt tW cko-c^es h&V^ ‘iA‘4\ws uiGvrrctfrV Wbikc^ P^A^cxx^k ^T ’2. ' ?\ ^xxc\udC^sV\\\^6^ oA , does 4Ua\sc> k\)a\xb(A^4Vvs wxcvCr'CvA'V O V'mnV uxxr^v Uxo^ ‘ AA.^es Ivsred k dW docvc^aAt U^ka Pe-V^db^ k oAc&. u/xa^W^^X , Aoes W 9cx_V... ferexVr ^fe(x pWfyse <. o d0“ P'Or\o^ .jb’erSGrtk^ Hag. (ACC/\ S-ee<\ Ta O.G^C xse •Txs-Kmlq. vq CA\erv^c<r Aocjs or S^keSs dcv^? Lis>\ e>V PctcKes A\\ Wo were i f\AXxe ct>^\xo^ oV ^A^ct^ miW. CXXycr pc^e,, A ViA" oA oA\ ^arW.^2. 4b 4W ^rbc^y^ o£4V^dx\\b(\ Is <k^ YoWbkbSX. jbe^xcW (0?f\ce.6W4We £)'ysVlA AWorb^A ReVd^ (jc&^ I * Sou^enx Dvs\<\ Ar bW Q>e_Org\c<, ~ CoS^ Wb.^ 1 *" CM23>S <3.v Sok?tasr(\ V^xsAcrA<?t' <s£ Georcpcx ° Ccx&s Wo* » I * XS-ojCiCS * iT ’ 3^ M ’^e DisV/i^ of Co^e No^ms-ev~39-s?c-kcp A * R\W Superior CoxjjV'" Ca^ Mou< ^G&SRcy\Ko06& 5. CVwAj&^tc. C^bA^WXbGcKy CtrcuA CtsvrVCzxs'e, 133-'756? CIauAgV^ CdwaV^FW^ ik WircuxV Courf Case A)o\> I060P erf C\C\b SVcXXori^ ^ro\)\s lbl\S> ih\)(A.\i2^> SXc^ewX: c£ AVe . e, t, v. x> ._ u>6\ fc b , u . > *» V to u t? „ , ArJex. a? A^et^lxes 6 a b ,fa> S b 6><■ » . «. 8 *» <-■' b. (. I JS U. S3 .40 . 4^ . 103 ■fc 109 u. Ill TA^LC OF AwfaoRrTses STATtATBS AX)O R\xL££ FU » s-VxV ^(xn R<x.sVV4^OT . ' 5¥c\ v OTk03zt GTHER. * !Gt X' PoTCKi \l X 11. G ca v CcjfxsV >> AcVj See. I ? P<xr&< v T. fonsh Arh ar, 3eulttG^R.Mw c^33 , IPt Fit RcSuclb >J 3 b IAS C&x\Av Am6u \) 7 <4x IAS Q&cv^tK AfA^k\)ZV J 5.. Us CbraV Am\ 4G*. Las Cg>(\s¥\ Aaag)^, X.XM pi ca > cc>!\sAcv aA\ Xj Sec. t y VI2.0 v Qca . Cb^sX /l<¥^Sec^xj 4-K/A1X5X) 21 \ Gcv* C6n& Ad > 3^Sec. 31, Pafft * A\l X g‘ (WxMcX^o XXIX m Coc&¥ /\A > . -Wy |l RlocUu^r Mv 5^CV?^^ L^'^l Xzc7(?9tf9\ y B^cVVeAss AX Per^S^M^ 6' ’ -‘ " s £V, LnvH^ (\?n£ 3-1 K)c><Aa CojAxnx . xK RatAfos , 355 s s’ cVx cc5 U J (AkWer Mv Fibril W ^s. <_ -1 5. S+reep X). Unte&te, •«> U's* l^’33^ „ F3> fl5(j IIS< IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of habeasoorpusissue. OPINIONS BELOW i<| For cases from federal courts: s . The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at