No. 25-5768
Lorene Chittenden v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: court-interpretation fourth-circuit intervening-change legal-deadline restitution-statute timely-appeal
Latest Conference:
2025-11-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the fourth circuit ruling that Chittenden did not file a timely appeal apply given an intervening change in law?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
is this: Should the fourth circuit ruling that Chittenden did not file a timely appeal apply since there has been an intervening change in the law recognizing an issue that was not previously available? Holland. 181 F. 3d 597, 605-06. % » 11
Docket Entries
2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 30, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent