Whether the Eighth Circuit erred in affirming the dismissal of Petitioner's Due Process claim regarding COVID-19 vaccine classification and mandate

1. Whether the Eighth Circuit erred in affirming the dismissal of Petitioner ’s Due Process claim without remanding for factual development on the COVID-19 vaccine ’s classification as non-traditional, in conflict with the Ninth Circuit ’s approach in Health Freedom Defense Fund v. Carvalho, Inc., No. 22-55908 (9th Cir. 2024), which accepted similar allegations as plausible for pleading purposes. 2. Whether a private employer ’s mandate of a non-traditional vaccine without informed consent violates the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act’s (GINA) coercion prohibition, particularly when based on an enjoined federal executive order. 3. Whether a private employer can be held Hable under constitutional or GINA . frameworks for enforcing a federal executive order subject to judicial injunctions, such as Executive Order 14042. II