No. 25-5791
Raymond White v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review charging-instrument criminal-procedure plain-error plea-review presentence-report
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2025-11-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, in conducting plain-error prejudice review of a plea taken in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, an appellate court may rely primarily on unobjected-to allegations in the presentence report and charging instrument, rather than the defendant's contrary sworn statements at the change of plea hearing
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether, in conducting plain-error prejudice review of a plea taken in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, an appellate court may rely primarily on unobjected -to allegations in the presentence report and charging instrument, rather than the defendant’s contrary sworn statements at the change of plea hearing.
Docket Entries
2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-10
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2025)
Attorneys
Raymond White
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent