No. 25-5796

Daniel Matthew Matlock v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-10-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-statute federal-question mens-rea sexual-abuse statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the term 'knowingly' in 18 U.S.C. § 2242(1) applies only to 'causing another person to engage in a sexual act' or whether it extends also to 'threatening or placing that other person in fear'

Question Presented (from Petition)

This Cou rt has con sistently and repeatedly held that the term “knowi ngly” in a cri minal statute must apply to all of the elements of the crime that make the defendant’s con duct criminal, i.e., the elements that evince a “ vicious will” as distinguished from otherwise innocen t conduct. The question presen ted is: Wh ether the term “knowingly” in 18 U .S.C. § 2242( 1) (sexu al abuse) applies on ly to “causing another person to engage i n a sexu al act” or wh ether it extends also to “threat ening or p lacing that other person in fear.”

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-10
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2025)

Attorneys

Daniel Matthew Matlock
Gregory Mitchell Acton Sr.Acton Law Office, PC, Petitioner
Gregory Mitchell Acton Sr.Acton Law Office, PC, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent