No. 25-5798

Mikhael Y. Lerman v. Celine E. Lerman

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2025-10-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection family-law fourteenth-amendment thirteenth-amendment
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2026-02-20 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether California Family Code § 2550 violates Equal Protection and Due Process rights and constitutes an unconstitutional taking or involuntary servitude

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Whether California Family Code § 2550, as applied in this case, violates my Equal Protection and Due Process rights. 2. Whether rigid equal division amounts to an unconstitutional taking under the Fourteenth Amendment or involuntary servitude under the Thirteenth Amendment. 3. Whether the doctrine of the highest power and the second highest power should be recognized as a constitutional principle to ensure structural fairness. 2 [59] PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28Petitioner: MIKHAEL Y. LERMAN TABLE OF CONTENT Respondent: CELINE E.LERMAN

Docket Entries

2026-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2025-12-13
Petitioner complied with Court's order of December 8, 2025.
2025-12-08
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 29, 2025, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2025-11-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 3, 2025)

Attorneys

Mikhael Y. Lerman
Mikhael Y. Lerman — Petitioner
Mikhael Y. Lerman — Petitioner