Whether hydroelectric dams can be removed without Congressional consent and whether courts can dismiss cases as frivolous without thorough investigation

No question identified. : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38QUESTIONS[S] PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Q(x) 1. Shall any hydroelectric dam be removed in the United States without express consent of Congress, when the simple, scientific solution is dam maintenance to include dredging to remove contaminated silt, heat-scrubbing toxins, installing or repairing fish ladders, and retrofitting for earthquake if needed? 2. Shall U.S. Courts persist in extreme bias against pro se or any litigant, contrary to Loper Bright, especially in use of Administrative Law to nullify Federal Law for Summary Judgment, by dismissing a case as frivolous when defense fails to Appear, in collusion for obstruction of justice? 3. Shall a judge who dismisses a case when Defense fails to Appear be guilty of Misprision of Felony, having reviewed the felonies admitted by abandonment of the Defense, and then doing nothing to adjudicate them, in defiance of Loper Bright? 4. Shall the Circuit Court of Appeals violate its protocol for selecting a unique panel of judges for each case tried when a litigant has simultaneously presented two or more unique cases for review? 5. Shall “good behavior ” in Article III, Section 1 be defined in part by compliance with Federal Rules, Federal Laws and the U.S. Constitution itself. 6. Shall the Circuit Court of Appeals refer a PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DISPOSITIVE ORDER to the same panel of judges whose extreme bias in dismissing that very case is being challenged by pro se, or any litigants? 7. Shall any Court dismiss a Complaint as frivolous when Defendants are in default by the 21+1 day FRCP rule or have otherwise made public confession of a crime such as killing hundreds of endangered fish? * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 408. Shall pseudo-scientists in an East Coast Agency be denied extraCongressional authority to order vandalism of West Coast dams (2008 Bi-Op), contrary to the opposition of West Coast scientists and local stakeholders? 10. Shall judges in the Ninth Circuit persist in violation of Loper Bright, thus denying citizens 14th Amendment equal protection under the law, compared to citizens in other jurisdictions such as the Tenth Circuit, which comply with Loper Bright, per their home page? 11. Shall a ruling of “frivolous ” be rendered only after a thorough investigation of case facts, rather than subjective Judicial Discretion. 12. If a case is found to be frivolous after thorough investigation, shall the accuser be subject to the same penalty that he attempted to inflict on the accused? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40